EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing the effects of analogical instruction with internal and external focus of attention on golf putting skill learning in children with developmental coordination disorder: Emphasizing mental representation structure

Saeed Nazari Kakvandi, Hesam Ramezanzade and Hassan Kordi

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 6, 1-26

Abstract: This study examined the effects of implicit learning-based instruction—analogy, external focus (EF), and their combination—on golf putting performance and learning in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Given that internal focus of attention often competes with external focus by drawing attention to body movements, combining analogy with EF may help direct attention externally by simplifying movement execution. Sixty children aged 7–9 with DCD were randomly assigned to five groups: analogical instruction, EF, internal focus (IF), analogical-external focus (A-EF), and control. The IF group focused on their striking hand; the EF group focused on the putter’s path and target. The analogical group performed a pendulum-like swing based on a biomechanical metaphor. The A-EF group combined the pendulum analogy with EF instructions. The control group received no instructional cues. Participants completed a pretest, followed by three acquisition sessions (3 × 20 trials per session), immediate and delayed retention tests (72 hours post-practice), a transfer test (from a 5.5-meter distance), and an automaticity test under dual-task conditions. Results showed that, collapsed across acquisition sessions, both the external focus (EF) and combined analogy-external focus (A-EF) groups significantly outperformed the internal focus (IF) group. In retention, transfer, and dual-task performance, all three implicit learning groups (A, EF, A-EF) performed significantly better than the IF and control groups. These findings suggest that implicit instructional methods, particularly the combined approach, enhance motor learning in children with DCD, likely due to reduced reliance on working memory and greater automaticity of movement execution.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351065 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 51065&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0351065

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351065

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-22
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351065