EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Barriers, motivations, and understanding: A qualitative study on the acceptability of an academic weight management program

Yongjia Deng, Kristen Moore, Patricia Galanti, Laura Davisson, Nasser Alrayyes, Cristhian Perez, Patricia Dekeseredy and Treah Haggerty

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 6, 1-1

Abstract: Introduction: Obesity is a critical health issue, and West Virginia is a state with an exceptionally high obesity rate. There are evidence-based medical guidelines for treating obesity utilized by medical weight management programs. The primary purpose of this study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the acceptability of an academic medical weight management program that utilizes guidelines-based treatment for obesity. Methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 20 participants enrolled in an academic medical weight management program. Interviews were completed and transcribed. Themes were identified through qualitative content analysis. Results: Twenty participants enrolled in a medical weight management clinic participated. Five main themes emerged during analysis of the interview content: 1) satisfaction with clinical and support staff, 2) desire for additional touchpoints with clinical staff, 3) perception of non-judgmental support, 4) perception of support by the clinic following policy changes affecting treatment coverage, and 5) participation due to intrinsic motivation. Conclusion: Patients enrolled in medical weight management clinics exhibit a wide diversity of motivations for their desired weight loss, but commonly face a variety of challenges to their care, including unreliable insurance coverage and social stigma related to obesity. However, the resulting themes identify acceptable approaches for medical weight management clinics such as increase touch points, supportive clinical staff who provide non-judgmental support, and an understanding of participants intrinsic motivations.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351217 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 51217&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0351217

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351217

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-14
Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351217