Economic evaluation of the second-line regimen of liposome irinotecan (II) combined with 5-FU/LV versus placebo combined with 5-FU/LV for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in China

Jinlong Huang, Hanyun Ye, Jingyang Lin, Dan Luo, Ping Huang and Xiaochun Zheng

PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 6, 1-12

Abstract: Background: The cost-effectiveness of liposome irinotecan (II) (HR070803) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as a treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma offering a potential new standard of care has not been established. Considering the high cost of liposome irinotecan (II), the aim of this study was to evaluate the economic value of liposome irinotecan (II) combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin（5-FU/LV） versus placebo combined with 5-FU/LV for this indication from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: We developed a three-state Markov model based on the trial: NCT05074589 to estimate lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effect ratios (ICERs) in terms of cost per QALY gained. The utility of health status and the disutility of adverse events were obtained from the published literature. Costs were obtained from local hospitals and published literature. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a discount rate of 5% per year. To assess the robustness of the model, univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: In the base-case analysis, liposome irinotecan (II) regimen provided an additional 0.08 QALYs compared to the placebo regimen with an ICER of $310,418.81/ QALY gained, which indicates that the liposome irinotecan (II) regimen is not cost-effective at the $39,221.95/ QALY threshold. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the model was most sensitive to the utility of PFS, the cost of liposome irinotecan (II), and the utility of PD. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the liposome irinotecan (II) regimen had a probability of 0 for having a cost effect at $39,221.95/ QALY. Price simulations show that the liposome irinotecan (II) option is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $39,221.95/QALY if the price of liposome irinotecan (II) is reduced to $2.93/mg (88.6% reduction). Conclusions: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, liposome irinotecan (II) in combination with 5-FU/LV was less cost-effective than placebo in combination with 5-FU/LV for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351853 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 51853&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0351853

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351853

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().