Patent license prediction using deep survival analysis: A comparative study
Takao Arai and
Hiroyasu Inoue
PLOS ONE, 2026, vol. 21, issue 9, 1-16
Abstract:
Objective: We evaluate deep survival analysis frameworks for patent licensing prediction, systematically comparing cure rate models against standard approaches and quantifying the benefit of temporal modeling over static classification to address unresolved methodological questions following recent applications of neural survival models to patent contexts. Methods: We conducted experimental validation on 624,129 United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents (2016–2017), comparing classical Cox regression, deep neural network baseline, DeepSurv (neural Cox proportional hazards), and Cox cure rate models. Performance was evaluated using Recall@K metrics across 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year prediction horizons, with statistical significance assessed through patent-level bootstrap resampling (B = 1,000). Results: All deep learning approaches achieve high performance (Recall@10% 89.8–91.9%), substantially outperforming classical Cox regression (70.6–72.3%). Among neural architectures, DeepSurv—a standard neural Cox proportional hazards model—offers the optimal balance of simplicity and performance. More complex cure rate extensions provided no clear additional benefit over standard DeepSurv within the scope of this study: although bootstrap resampling detected a small but statistically significant difference (0.70 percentage points), this gap is practically negligible for patent screening, suggesting that explicit population heterogeneity modeling offers limited practical gains when deep feature learning is employed. Survival modeling provides statistically detectable but modest gains over static binary classification (Recall@10% differences of 0.5–1.6 percentage points), indicating that the primary value stems from capturing complex patent characteristics rather than explicit temporal modeling. Conclusion: This study provides, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic evaluation of cure rate models and temporal modeling benefits for patent licensing prediction, demonstrating that architectural simplicity (DeepSurv) achieves near-optimal performance (Recall@10% 91%) when deep feature learning is prioritized. The findings offer actionable guidance for patent portfolio management: invest in feature learning infrastructure rather than architectural sophistication.
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355826 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 55826&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0355826
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355826
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().