The moral prejudice by “back bounce

Serghei Vahnovan
Additional contact information
Serghei Vahnovan: "Babes Bolyai" University of Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Law, Romania

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2005, vol. 20-21, 120-126

Abstract: The admission of this principle was for long a controversial aspect in the Romanian and French doctrine that didn’t accept the recovery for this prejudice. It was accepted only the recovery from the prejudice suffered by the direct victim, because the acceptance of the recovery from the moral prejudice by back bounce was regarded as being against morals and against the principle that the prejudice must be fully recovered and only one time. Accordingly only the direct victim could get compensation for the suffered prejudice, the indirect victims being regarded as persons that are trying to abuse the legal system for getting undeserving benefits, as well as immoral because they use someone else’s suffering.

Keywords: Prejudice; Moral; Back Bounce; Compensation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... cj05/rcj051_210F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:20-21:y:2005:p:120-126

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).