JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER THE SOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE PROSECUTOR AS REGARDS NON- ARRAIGNMENT- ASPECTS OF JUDICIARY THEORY AND PRACTICE

Camelia SERBAN Morareanu
Additional contact information
Camelia SERBAN Morareanu: The Faculty of Juridical and Administrative Sciences from the University of Pitesti, Prosecutor - The Prosecutor's Office of the Court of Appeal Pitesti, Romania

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2010, vol. 40, 98-105

Abstract: Answering to the exigencies of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which also guarantees among others, the right to get access to an independent and impartial court toward the executive power, the Law no. 281 from 2003, art. 2781 has been introduced in the Criminal Procedure Code which specifically consecrates the right of the injured person to address the court in case he is not satisfied with the solution of his complaint against the solutions of non-arraignment adopted by the prosecutor.

Keywords: criminal case; prosecutor; court; judicial control. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K14 K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... /recjurid101_10F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:40:y:2010:p:98-105

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).