THE SUBJECTS OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CONTRACT - ABOUT DISCRIMINATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES IN THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE RELATION
Raul-Felix Hodos and
Daniela Micu
Additional contact information
Raul-Felix Hodos: PhD, assistant professor, "Petru Maior" University of Tirgu Mures; lawyer, National Association of Romanian Bars - Bucharest Bar, ROMANIA.
Daniela Micu: Insolvency practitioner, Romanian National Association of Practitioners in Insolvency - Mures Branch, ROMANIA.
Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2017, vol. 70, 56-70
Abstract:
In this paper, the authors want to approach a subject which affirms its actuality even after the promulgation of a new set of public procurement legislation in May and June 2016: in what way the principle of equal and non-discriminative treatment between the participants at this type of procedure can be applied. The issue of the implementation of these rules is caused, among other things, by the fact that Law 98/2016 is vague, because it only establishes that two of the most important principles of public procurement are the ones of non-discrimination and equal treatment, in application of which each contracting authority has the obligation to avoid breaches in fair competition. Thus, the legislature must establish clear criteria and rules in order to detail the way public procurement principles (which are concisely presented in the primary legislation) are to be implemented in order to avoid a disloyal competition between the economic operators which are involved in the execution of public procurement contracts.
Keywords: : public procurement; principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination; competition; Law no. 98/2016; remedies and sanctions for discrimination in public procurement. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... 7/recjurid173_4F.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:70:y:2017:p:56-70
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).