SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTIOUS. COMPARATIVE LAW ASPECTS

Ximena Moldovan
Additional contact information
Ximena Moldovan: Assistant lecturer Phd., Faculty of Economics and Law, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures; Lawyer, Mures Bar, ROMANIA

Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 2019, vol. 79, 69-73

Abstract: Following the approach of a comparative law perspective, we are able to perceive, in the doctrinal, legislative and jurisprudential evolutions of the judicial systems considered in the present study, a common tendency to unify the jurisdictions, reaching at this moment a relative uniformity of the national jurisdictional guarantees in various law systems. The regulation of the judicial procedures that involve the public administration seems, in fact, to develop and generally to converge to forms of protection that are increasingly closer to those established in disputes between private persons before the courts of common law.

Keywords: administrative contentious; judicial litigation body; administrative litigation body (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/ ... 9/recjurid194_8F.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:79:y:2019:p:69-73

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique from Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bogdan Voaidas ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).