Критерії оцінки доказовості аудиторського судження

Criteria of Assessment of the Auditor’s Judgment Evidence

Nadiia Manko
Additional contact information
Nadiia Manko: National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit

Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, 2018, vol. 4, issue 12, 1021-1030

Abstract: The article presents the results of the study on the formation of an independent opinion of the reliability of financial accounting, which is reflected in the auditor’s report and is based on his intermediate conclusions. It has been established that determining the sufficiency of evidence presents a problem that consists in the auditor’s decision on the extent to which they are sufficient to prove the accuracy of his opinion as to the reliability of financial accounting. The study of methodological approaches to assessing the adequacy of audit evidence in the process of performing the audit task was conducted in order to provide evidence of the audit opinion regarding the reliability of the statements of management personnel, contained in the financial report indicators. The article presents the results of the research of scientific approaches concerning the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of audit evidence. Based on the analysis of the provisions of the International Standards on Quality Control, Audit, Inspection, Other Assurance and Related Services (ISA) and literary sources, the main criteria for evaluating audit evidence were identified, their content and terms of security were determined. The relationship between audit procedures and qualitative aspects of financial reporting was considered. Taking into account the requirements of the rules for assessing the reliability of the evidence, provided by the ISA 500 “Audit Evidence”, division of evidence into more and less reliable was made; generalized factors for the consideration in the process of assessing the reliability of evidence were generated. The process of assessing evidence at the stages of the audit task was considered and a conceptual model for assessing the adequacy of audit evidence was constructed.

Keywords: audit evidence; evaluation criteria; approval of management personnel; reliability; adequacy; audit procedures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/download/579/590 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pos:journl:41-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.22178/pos.41-7

Access Statistics for this article

Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science is currently edited by Andrey Kataev

More articles in Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science from Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andrey Kataev ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).