 Droit à l’avortement: sur quelle base légiférer ? enseignements tirés des Modèles de fertilité. Le cas de la Communauté économique et Monétaire de l’Afrique centrale (CEMAC)An Econometric Model of fertility choice for the Common States in the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Abstract: Since Barro and Becker (1989) – hencefore BB (1989) some facts as an epidemiologic pandemic is account for factor of fertility choice. Meanwhile in some place of the world as in Cameroon this advent is an Opportunity in increasing fertility rate like assess by Kuikeu (2020c). Therefore, is this means that an epidemiologic Advent is an favourable factor of fertility choice? In other terms, is the BB (1989) robusted as Model of fertility choice to this road of assessment about the Outbreak impact’s on the Reproductive health Objectives? These are the main questions we are trying to answer, here. Globally speaking, Obtained Results from an Panel framework reveals that BB (1989) remains at the one and the cornerstone of the analysis as Model of fertility choice. Keywords: reproductive health service; fertility rate; panel data; CEMAC (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:104195 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.