“Good” and “bad” GDP: Output fall in transition economies and the dead rat effect

Vladimir Popov

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Among the many explanations of the deep transformational recession in the post-communist economies during the transition from a centrally planned economy to market economy in the 1990s there is one that considers this recession as a statistical fiction: the elimination of “unneeded under a less wasteful economic system” output, such as defense goods and statues of Lenin, did not lead to the reduction of welfare. If adjustment is made for this kind of “redundant output”, there was probably no recession at all or it was very mild. This paper argues that the attempts to exclude some economic activities from a country’s GDP are counterproductive – the mere principle of statistical registration in this case is undermined. Unfortunately, we cannot agree on what type of economic activity is good for welfare and what type is bad. Slave trade and weapons for colonial wars, statues of Lenin and Egyptian pyramids, cannot be regarded as value subtraction, but should be included into GDP creation activities. The economic rationale for counting all activities as productive is that GDP is a measurement of production capacity, or economic potential of the country; it evaluates the ability of a nation to produce a particular amount of goods and services, no matter what is the exact nomenclature of these goods and services.

Keywords: calculation of GDP; transformational recession; welfare and GDP; centrally planned economies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 E0 E01 P24 P51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-11-29
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/115490/1/MPRA_paper_115490.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:115490

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter (winter@lmu.de).