EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fairness, Ambiguity and disinflation costs

Andre Lunardelli

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The notion that much of the reduction in disinflation costs in recent decades is due to better anchoring converges with the proposition of Dow, Simonsen and Werlang (1993) that part of the sacrifice ratios of poorly anchored economies may be caused by this coordination problem, which they modeled with ambiguity. The present paper relates this effect with fairness in a labor market in which past inflation is a reference for wage readjustments, but without a materialized reduction in effort associated with reciprocity. As in Bhaskar (1990), this coordination problem is modeled with increases in the elasticity of the wage equation, which imply lower sensibility of wage readjustments to the monetary policy of disinflations – and this is used here as a measure of the studied ambiguity. Bayesian inference with US data shows that this indicator trended upward from the mid-1960s and throughout the Great Inflation, with local peaks after the oil shocks but being significantly higher during the Volcker disinflation, leading to increases in unemployment and decreases in output. Subsequently it was rapidly reduced, with further reductions during the low inflation consolidation of the early nineties, and it was quite mild in the post-COVID-19 pandemics disinflation. The fact that the effect was markedly stronger in the Volcker disinflation (a “nominal shock”) than in the sequences of the adverse oil shocks (“real shocks”) of the Great Inflation signals to the relevance of a nominal anchoring problem, with Volcker’s aggressive monetary policy being one way of dealing with this, and inflation targeting (IT) being a second-generation related treatment. Furthermore, due to their potentially higher degree of ambiguity, disinflations of very high inflation begin with the use of exchange rate anchors (a coordination mechanism similar to the Brazilian Real plan is an alternative), that should be followed, when ambiguity reaches a moderate level, by the announcement and posterior implementation of an IT regime.

Keywords: Ambiguity; disinflation; fairness; wage markups; sacrifice ratios; Volcker disinflation; inflation persistence; inflation targeting; Brazilian Real plan; labor hoarding. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D80 E31 E32 E42 E52 E58 J39 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-08-27, Revised 2026-05-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129559/1/MPRA_paper_129559.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:129559

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().

 
Page updated 2026-06-27
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129559