A note on the indeterminacy and arbitrariness of pena’s method of construction of synthetic indicators

Sudhanshu Mishra ()

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In this paper we demonstrate that Pena’s method of construction of a synthetic indicator is very sensitive to the order in which the constituent variables (whose linear aggregation yields the synthetic indicator) are arranged. Since m number of constituent variables may be arranged in m-factorial ways, even a moderately large m can give rise to a very large number of synthetic indicators from which one cannot choose the one which best represents the constituent variables. Given that an analyst has too little information as to the order in which a sizeable number of constituent variables must be arranged so as to obtain the best representative synthetic indicator, Pena’s method can give only an arbitrary synthetic indicator whose representativeness is indeterminate and uncertain.

Keywords: Synthetic indicators; Composite Indices; Human development; NP-Hard problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C43 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-03-19
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37534/1/MPRA_paper_37534.pdf original version (application/pdf)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37554/1/MPRA_paper_37554.pdf revised version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:37534

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().