The performance evaluation of hedge funds: a comparison of different approaches using European data
Alessandro Carretta (carretta@uniroma2.it) and
Gianluca Mattarocci
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
The standard approach to the evaluation of funds assumes a normal return distribution and uses the variance as a measure of the funds risk. A few characteristics of hedge funds, such as the remuneration mechanism of the portfolio manager, make this assumption unacceptable and the traditional approach of Risk Adjusted Performance (RAP) must be revised before applying it to hedge funds. Some authors define a number of different RAP measures that attempt to overcome the problem related to the lack of normality: new RAPs are characterized by a more detailed return distribution analysis that does not consider only the first two moments of the distribution. A higher computational complexity may only be reasonable if selections founded on new RAPs permit to identify better investment opportunities than those selected with standard RAPs. This work analyses different approaches proposed with a view to calculating the RAP for hedge funds and evaluates advantages and limits of each proposed measure. An application of these measures to the European hedge funds market is proposed in order to demonstrate the usefulness of new approaches. An empirical analysis studies differences in funds classification based on different measures and demonstrates that the standard RAP approach is unable to identify the best performing hedge funds.
Keywords: Hedge funds; Risk Adjusted Performance and performance persistence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E47 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-06, Revised 2007-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4294/1/MPRA_paper_4294.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:4294
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter (winter@lmu.de).