Argumentación y guerras civiles

Argumentation and Civil Wars

Fernando Estrada

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In this article, basic aspects of the argumentation, the argumentation relations with the concept of logical inference and illustration argumentation on international comparative policy analysis are presented. The argumentation is understood as part of a deliberative process reasons for or against a point of view that can be defended by a confrontation of ideas. Therefore who argues: proposed refutes defeat or justify a particular worldview. For this purpose, a brief preliminary description of deductive argument systems (SDA). Degree of formalization from logic to structure the foundations of argumentation in general is introduced, then an illustration is provided based on a case widely recognized in international politics: the conditions of the public debate that led to the invasion and war against Iraq.

Keywords: Irak; Civil Wars; Logic; Argumentation; International Relations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 D82 F51 F52 F54 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58461/1/MPRA_paper_58461.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:58461

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().