Tuition Grant and Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff in Stages of Higher Education Development

Yoseph Getachew ()
Additional contact information
Yoseph Getachew: Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

No 201882, Working Papers from University of Pretoria, Department of Economics

Abstract: We study how taxes and alternative higher education financing such as universal, scholarship, and means tested tuition grant schemes affect different groups of individuals, and the implications to equity-efficiency trade off at different phases of higher education development. We based on a simple overlapping generations model where agents are heterogenous in terms of their initial human capital and their ability to learn. Only individuals who afford to pay the minimum tuition fee up front join college while government engages in different types of education subsidy and financing programs. Despite the economy starts from an early stage where only few elites have access to higher education, through a positive externality effects of education that increases individuals. productivity, it ends up to a highly advanced economy where the majority invest in higher education. Among our findings, a scholarship program is the most efficient higher-education-subsidy program at all stages of higher education development due to its highly regressive nature. Wealth distribution under means-tested Lorenz dominates the one in scholarship in all stages. In the early stages, laissez faire is second best followed by universal grant, when it comes to mitigating inequality. In the late stage, universal subsidy Lorenz dominates laissez faire in general and it Lorenz dominates the rest of the schemes for the bottom poor, followed by the laissez fair. However, if the purpose is to narrow the gap between the top earners and the rest of the society, scholarship is the second best. We also find at this stage enrollment rate increases in universal subsidy but decreases in other policies, implying the recent shift away from universal grant scheme in the UK could lead to a decline in enrollment rate.

Keywords: Education subsidy and financing; public policy; inequality; Growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 56 pages
Date: 2018-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.up.ac.za/media/shared/61/WP/wp_2018_82.zp166306.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pre:wpaper:201882

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Pretoria, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Rangan Gupta ().