EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Were Compulsory Attendance and Child Labor Laws Effective? An Analysis from 1915 to 1939

Adriana Lleras-Muney

No 273, Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing.

Abstract: Secondary schooling experienced incredible growth in the first 40 years of the 20th Century. Was legislation on compulsory attendance and child labor responsible for this growth? This paper analyzes a detailed set of laws, examining their effect on the entire distribution of education. It also looks at the factors that explain changes in the laws. Using individual data from the 1960 census, I estimate the effect of these laws on educational achievement for individuals who were 14 years old between 1915 and 1939. The results show that legally requiring a child to attend school for one more year, either by increasing the age required to obtain a work permit or by lowering the entrance age, increased educational attainment by about 5%. Interestingly the effect was similar for white males and females, but there was no effect for blacks. Continuation school laws, which required working children to attend school on a part time basis, were effective for white males only. I also find that the laws increased the education only of those in the lower percentiles of the distribution of education. This result is consistent with what theory predicts if the laws were indeed enforced. By increasing the education of the lower tail, the laws contributed to the decrease in educational inequality, perhaps by as much as 15%. States with more wealth and a higher percentage of immigrants were more likely to pass more stringent laws, and states with higher percentage of blacks were less likely to do so. Importantly, the results also suggest that the laws were not endogenous during this period, in the sense that compulsory attendance and child labor laws caused education to increase, not vice-versa.

JEL-codes: I28 J13 K31 N31 N32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0B ... X0ZpbFlXSjV2Mzg/view
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 400 Bad Request (https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBX0ZpbFlXSjV2Mzg/view [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://www.google.com/a/princeton.edu/ServiceLogin?service=wise&passive=1209600&osid=1&continue=https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBX0ZpbFlXSjV2Mzg/view&followup=https://drive.google.com/a/princeton.edu/file/d/0BwjFN4HbBrDBX0ZpbFlXSjV2Mzg/view [302 Moved Temporarily]--> https://idp.princeton.edu/idp/profile/SAML2/Redirect/SSO?SAMLRequest=fVLJTsMwEL0j8Q%2BR79lakJDVBBUQohJL1AYO3FxnmhpsT%2FA4Lfw9bgoCDvT6%2FOYt45mcvxsdbcCRQluwPMlYBFZio2xbsMf6Oj5j5%2BXx0YSE0R2f9n5t5%2FDWA%2FkoTFriw0PBemc5ClLErTBA3Eu%2BmN7d8lGS8c6hR4maRbOrguGrbkSHL9Z0KM1avLYro0FrJZatlcYopTqtGmDR03es0S7WjKiHmSUvrA9QNjqNs3E8zup8zPMTPho%2Fs6j6crpQdt%2FgUKzlnkT8pq6ruHpY1IPAJni7%2B8AuWIvYakgkmp19JYjUJsAroSnEmxKB8yHgJVrqDbgFuI2S8Di%2FLdja%2B454mm632%2BRHJhVp55SV4NEm0PSpkMTKYbl86Od%2BbfVwevHtzsr%2F9SfpL%2Bny6xN33WZXFWolP6Kp1ri9dCB8KOZdH3pdozPC%2F%2B%2BeJ%2FmAqCZeDVTeW%2BpAqpWChkVpuXf9ey3hhj4B&RelayState=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fa%2Fprinceton.edu%2FServiceLogin%3Fservice%3Dwise%26passive%3Dtrue%26osid%3D1%26continue%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdrive.google.com%252Fa%252Fprinceton.edu%252Ffile%252Fd%252F0BwjFN4HbBrDBX0ZpbFlXSjV2Mzg%252Fview%26followup%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fdrive.google.com%252Fa%252Fprinceton.edu%252Ffile%252Fd%252F0BwjFN4HbBrDBX0ZpbFlXSjV2Mzg%252Fview)

Related works:
Journal Article: Were Compulsory Attendance and Child Labor Laws Effective? An Analysis from 1915 to 1939 (2002) Downloads
Working Paper: Were Compulsory Attendance and Child Labor Laws Effective? An Analysis from 1915 to 1939 (2001) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cheawb:8

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:pri:cheawb:8