Predicting Mortality from Standard and Nontraditional Biomarkers

Noreen Goldman, Cassio Turra, Dana Glei, Christopher Seplaki and Yu-Hsuan Lin
Additional contact information
Noreen Goldman: Princeton University
Dana Glei: University of California, Berkeley
Christopher Seplaki: Johns Hopkins University
Yu-Hsuan Lin: Bureau of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, Taiwan

No 288, Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Office of Population Research.

Abstract: Few studies focus on preclinical warning signs associated with mortality. In this paper, we investigate associations between all-cause mortality and two clusters of biological risk factors: 1) standard clinical measures related to cardiovascular disease and metabolic function; and 2) nontraditional measures pertaining to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, sympathetic nervous system activity and inflammatory response. Data come from the 2000 Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study, a national sample of Taiwanese ages 54 and older: 1497 persons were interviewed in their homes and 1023 participated in a hospital examination. The analysis is based on 927 respondents with complete information. Logistic regression models describe the association between biomarkers and the three-year probability of dying. Although both groups of biomarkers are significantly associated with mortality, a model with nontraditional biomarkers has better explanatory and discriminatory power than one with clinical measures. The association between the nontraditional measures and mortality remains strong after adjustment for the clinical markers, suggesting that the physiological effects of the nontraditional biomarkers are broader than those captured by the cardiovascular and metabolic system measures included here. Nontraditional markers are likely to provide early warning signs of deteriorating health and function beyond what can be learned from conventional markers. Our findings are consistent with recent studies that 1) demonstrate the importance of neuroendocrine and immune system markers for survival, and 2) indicate that standard clinical variables are less predictive of mortality in older than in younger populations.

Keywords: biomarkers; mortality; aging; Taiwan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://web.archive.org/web/20150906193417/http:// ... u/papers/opr0601.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:opopre:opr0601.pdf

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Office of Population Research. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bobray Bordelon ().