Harrod on the classification of technological progress. The origin of a wild-goose chase

Daniele Besomi

BNL Quarterly Review, 1999, vol. 52, issue 208, 95-117

Abstract: From the 1930s to the 1970s many economists debated the classification of technological progress into neutral, labour- or capital-saving inventions. One of them was R.F. Harrod, who defined neutral inventions as those in which the capital-output ratio remains unaffected at a certain rate of interest. The present work examines the origin and development of Harrod’s notion of neutrality, illustrating how it was characterised, what conceptual framework it presupposed, and what function it played within his dynamic economics.

Keywords: Beliefs; opinions and attitudes; Economists; Production functions (Economics); Harrod; R.F. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/PSLQuarterlyReview/article/view/10623/10507 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Harrod on the classification of technological progress. The origin of a wild-goose chase (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:psl:bnlaqr:1999:14

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.economiacivile.it

Access Statistics for this article

BNL Quarterly Review is currently edited by Alessandro Roncaglia

More articles in BNL Quarterly Review from Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Carlo D'Ippoliti ().