Efficient and Sustainable Management of Shared Fisheries in Thailand: Self-Governance or Regulation?
Rawadee Jarungrattanapong and
Therese Lindahl
No 237, PIER Discussion Papers from Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research
Abstract:
Artisanal fisheries are significant for poverty alleviation, but they are severely threatened by overfishing and climate change effects. Governance solutions can be hard to find when their implementation and success depend on both social and ecological contexts. In this study, our objective is to increase our understanding of behavioral strategies adopted by artisanal fisheries under different types of regulations using a field experiment in the form of a so-called common-pool resource (CPR) experiment with 540 artisanal fishers in Nakorn Si Thammarat province, Thailand. Our results reveal that: (i) a quota treatment provide higher overall efficiency and leads to more sustainable management compared to the treatment with an unregulated fishery. (ii) the higher probability of punishment in the quota treatment promotes more equal sharing of payoffs from the experiment among group members compared to a quota treatment with a low probability of punishment; and (iii) a higher degree of monitoring in the quota system prevents resource depletion. Our results suggest that the community empowerment in these artisanal fishery communities is not strong enough to make fishers cooperate effectively without regulation and that a quota system may be one plausible solution. Our results also suggest, however, that the design of the monitoring and punishment systems may need careful consideration to ensure a sustainable solution.
Keywords: Quota; Self-governance; Total allowance catches; Artisanal fisheries; Lab-in-the-field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D70 Q22 Q28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 65 pages
Date: 2025-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env, nep-exp, nep-reg and nep-sea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.pier.or.th/files/dp/pier_dp_237.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pui:dpaper:237
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://www.pier.or.th/en/dp/237/
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in PIER Discussion Papers from Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().