The Use of the Compensation Principle in Evaluating the Efficiency Costs of Tax Distortions

Neil Bruce

Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University

Abstract: The sum of Hicksian compensation measure is shown to be the incorrect criterion for determining potential Pareto improvements. The correct criterion is a weighted average of households' compensation measures and is not, in principle, independent of the distribution of costs and benefits across households. This correct criterion yields the conventional welfare cost expression under exactly those conditions for which aggregate consumer demand systems can be consistently estimated.

Pages: 22
Date: 1979
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qed:wpaper:322

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Economics Department, Queen's University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Babcock ().