The Time Trade-Off Method: An Exploratory Study
Anne Spencer
Additional contact information
Anne Spencer: Queen Mary, University of London
No 437, Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance
Abstract:
In a pilot study we investigate whether the inferences we draw about people's preferences towards health care treatments are altered if we vary the procedure that is used to elicit these preferences. In a conventional Time Trade-Off question, respondents express their preferences towards treatment by comparing a period of ill-health with a shorter period in a higher quality of life. In our less conventional TTO question, we vary the procedure by asking respondents their preferences towards treatment by comparing a period of ill-health with a longer period in a lower quality of life. The quantitative data is equivocal about whether preferences for treatment differ between the conventional and unconventional questions. The qualitative data support the notion of contrasting issues in questions that involve prolonging time in a more severe quality of life and appear to account for a failure to find quantitative differences in all of the questions.
Keywords: Time Trade-Off; Procedural invariance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-10-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sef/media/econ/research/wor ... 2001/items/wp437.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:437
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicholas Owen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).