Undergraduate econometrics instruction: through our classes, darkly (in Russian)

Joshua Angrist and Jorn-Steffen Pischke

Quantile, 2019, issue 14, 1-20

Abstract: The past half-century has seen economic research become increasingly empirical, while the nature of empirical economic research has also changed. In the 1960s and 1970s, an empirical economist's typical mission was to “explain” economic variables like wages or GDP growth. Applied econometrics has since evolved to prioritize the estimation of specific causal effects and empirical policy analysis over general models of outcome determination. Yet econometric instruction remains mostly abstract, focusing on the search for “true models” and technical concerns associated with classical regression assumptions. Questions of research design and causality still take a back seat in the classroom, in spite of having risen to the top of the modern empirical agenda. This essay traces the divergent development of econometric teaching and empirical practice, arguing for a pedagogical paradigm shift.

Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://quantile.ru/14/14-AP.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qnt:quantl:y:2019:i:14:p:1-20

Access Statistics for this article

Quantile is currently edited by Stanislav Anatolyev

More articles in Quantile from Quantile
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stanislav Anatolyev ().