EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Contrastive Study of Image Repair Strategies Between Chinese and English Corporate Apologies

Zhanghong Xu and Shuyu Lin

International Journal of English and Cultural Studies, 2020, vol. 3, issue 1, 20-32

Abstract: In the era of globalization, social media have become important communication tools for enterprises in crisis. Corporate apologies are issued via social media to repair the tarnished corporate image, which might affect their survival. However, the way of apologizing varies from language/culture to language/culture. This study aims to investigate how Chinese and English corporate apologies are linguistically presented and to explore how damaged corporate image in different culture is repaired respectively. Under the framework of Benoit’s image repair strategies and CCSARP, and based on quantitative and qualitative analysis of the collected data, this paper makes a contrastive study of Chinese and English corporate apologies. The results show that Chinese and English corporate apologies share great similarities in using the strategies of mortification and corrective actions, while they are different in terms of other specific tactics such as bolstering, good intentions, defeasibility and minimization. It is also found that the denial is the least used strategy by both Chinese and English corporations to repair their tarnished image. Furthermore, they are quite t similar in using IFIDs, while intensifiers and hedges are more frequently employed in Chinese corporate apologies.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijecs/article/download/4817/4995 (application/pdf)
https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijecs/article/view/4817 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rfa:ijecsj:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:20-32

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of English and Cultural Studies from Redfame publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Redfame publishing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:rfa:ijecsj:v:3:y:2020:i:1:p:20-32