Changes in Analytical Perspectives across Administrations

Art Fraas () and Richard Morgenstern ()
Additional contact information
Art Fraas: Resources for the Future
Richard Morgenstern: Resources for the Future

RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future

Abstract: The core analytical benefit-cost elements of Executive Order 12291 are widely seen as having been embraced by both Democratic and Republican administrations. Some critics argue, however, that this embrace is superficial and serves more as a cover for political decisions. To address this question, this paper examines the analytical priorities presented in the annual Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations over the period from 1997 to 2012. While there is general agreement across administrations on such broad issues as the importance of the benefit-cost analysis in providing a shared framework and discipline to the analytic process, we identified important differences in six areas: the oversight role of OMB, monetization of benefits, scope of costs considered, behavioral economics, intergenerational benefits, and the general equilibrium impacts of regulation. All are active and exciting issues in the current scholarly work on regulation. These cross-administration differences, though, appear to reflect a relatively modest shifting across political parties on issues where reasonable people might disagree, rather than major ideological swings in approach.

Keywords: benefits; costs; regulation; economic growth and jobs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-09-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-14-35.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-14-35.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.rff.org/RFF/documents/RFF-DP-14-35.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-14-35

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Working Paper Series from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().