Reducing Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions through “Climate-Smart” Markets, Technical Innovation, and Emissions Credit Trading
Emily Joiner,
Suzanne Russo and
Michael Toman ()
Additional contact information
Emily Joiner: Resources for the Future
Suzanne Russo: Resources for the Future
No 23-10, RFF Issue Briefs from Resources for the Future
Abstract:
We examine three pathways for reducing agricultural greenhouse gas (ag-GHG) emissions in the United States that complement the Farm Bill’s Title II programs:support for the development of markets for “climate-smart” agricultural productsresearch and development (R&D) support by the public sector for technical innovation that improves capabilities to reduce ag-GHG emissionsag-GHG emissions credits that can be used by other GHG sources to offset a portion of their own emissions-reduction obligationsClimate-smart agricultural products have lower GHG emissions in their supply chains. In addition to how those reductions are accomplished and validated, a key issue is what demand there will be for such products if their costs exceed those of conventional alternatives.Agricultural R&D is supported under Title VII of the Farm Bill and through other means. Key issues are broadening the range of ag-GHG mitigation practices receiving R&D support and ensuring the fruits of agricultural R&D are relevant for and available to a diverse array of producers.Ag-GHG emissions credits facilitate lower costs for achieving emissions mitigation, which may also increase ambition for mitigation. To have ag-GHG emissions credits that are both environmentally sound and affordable, several measurement and validation challenges need to be addressed, including establishing that the claimed ag-GHG emissions reductions would not have happened anyway (in other words, they are additional).
Date: 2023-11-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rff.org/documents/4240/IB_23-10.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-23-10
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in RFF Issue Briefs from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().