Friendshoring the Battery Supply Chain: Are the New Regulations Feasible?

Madeline Craig-Scheckman, Trissanne Keen, Terry Zhang, Sarasadat Alavi and Michael A. Toman
Additional contact information
Michael A. Toman: Resources for the Future

No 26-12, RFF Reports from Resources for the Future

Abstract: Lithium iron phosphate batteries are important for storing intermittent renewable electricity and powering electric vehicles. This report assesses the extent to which the battery supply chain can be “friendshored,” now that clean energy tax credits are subject to stringent limits on involvement of “prohibited foreign entities.” This is not simply a matter of where materials are sourced: the regulated battery inputs also include manufacturing equipment, intellectual property, and technology licensing. The requirements are most problematic for the “midstream” segment of the supply chain—the processing of extracted critical minerals. “Upstream” (mineral extraction) and “downstream” (manufacture of battery components) inputs are less likely to be constrained. To be compliant, manufacturers must find new sources, scale up investment, and reduce dependence on technologies developed by prohibited foreign entities. Scenario analysis indicates that the supply chain is unlikely to be sufficiently friendshored before costly restrictions are triggered. Compliance timelines should reflect industrial realities in the sector.

Date: 2026-10-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rff.org/documents/5444/Report_26-12.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rff:report:rp-26-12

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in RFF Reports from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Resources for the Future ().