Energy Price Reform and Impacts on Social Welfare (in Thai)

Puree Sirasoontorn, Petchtharin Wongcharoen (), Wasin Siwasarit and Supawat Rungsuriyawiboon
Additional contact information
Puree Sirasoontorn: Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Thailand
Petchtharin Wongcharoen: Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Thailand, Postal: Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University (Rangsit Campus), 99 Moo 18 Paholyothin Road, Klong Luang, Rangsit, Pathumthani, 12121, Thailand
Wasin Siwasarit: Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Thailand
Supawat Rungsuriyawiboon: Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Thailand

Asian Journal of Applied Economics/ Applied Economics Journal, 2022, vol. 29, issue 2, 16-44

Abstract: This paper studies the cost structures of different types of diesels, considering both their private and external costs, to determine which are efficient. Partial equilibrium analysis is employed to analyze the impact on social welfare if the price structures are adjusted to be more efficient. The results show that the current price structure is inefficient and distorted. The current refinery prices do not reflect the private costs for all types of diesels. Today, marketing margins are used as a policy tool to incentivize gas stations to distribute and sell more high-speed diesel (HSD) and high-speed diesel B20 (HSDB20). In addition, the current excise tax rate covers other external costs that are not directly related to fuel consumption. As a result, the actual excise tax rate is much higher than the external cost of fuel consumption. For this reason, and due to price subsidies through the oil fund, HSD and HSDB20 diesel prices are below efficient prices. Our welfare analysis reveals that restructuring diesel prices to be more efficient will increase social welfare. This can be achieved by adjusting the marketing margins to be the same rate on the basis of cost of service and modifying the excise tax to reflect the true cost of externalities associated with fuel consumption, along with a road tax reform. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that price subsidies cannot promote social welfare even if appropriate subsidy rates are set according to the price gap approach. Reducing the role of oil funds is, therefore, necessary.

Keywords: demand estimation; socially optimal pricing structure; partial equilibrium analysis; welfare analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C20 D40 D60 D62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AEJ/article/view/261036/171834 Full text (application/pdf)
Asian Journal of Applied Economics/ Applied Economics Journal

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:apecjn:0072

Access Statistics for this article

Asian Journal of Applied Economics/ Applied Economics Journal is currently edited by Waleerat Suphannachart

More articles in Asian Journal of Applied Economics/ Applied Economics Journal from Kasetsart University, Faculty of Economics, Center for Applied Economic Research Center for Applied Economics Research, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Arannee Tongjankaew ().