Conceptualizing Auditors' Cognitive Heterogeneity: and Analyzing Its Role in Auditor Professional Skepticism

مفهوم‌پردازی ناهمگونی شناختی حسابرسان و تحلیل نقش آن در تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرس

Saeed Inanloo Moranloo, Meysam Arabzadeh, Mehdi Safari Gerayli, Hossein Jabbary and Mohammad Reza Mohagheghi
Additional contact information
Saeed Inanloo Moranloo: Ph.D. Student, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran.
Meysam Arabzadeh: Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran
Mehdi Safari Gerayli: Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, BG.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran
Hossein Jabbary: Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran
Mohammad Reza Mohagheghi: Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran

Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA), 2025, vol. 17, issue 2, 81-123

Abstract: Amid the inherent ambiguities and complexities of professional decision-making, cognitive dissonance in auditors' judgments distorts perceptions of financial realities. This study explores the hidden layers of cognition and the impact on the auditing profession. It presents a model of auditors’ cognitive dissonance and examines its role in fostering professional skepticism. Employing both qualitative and quantitative methods tailored to data collection needs, the study identifies components of auditors’ cognitive dissonance through content analysis and expert interviews informed by researcher-developed questionnaires. Professional skepticism was assessed via a standardized questionnaire. Additionally, structural equation modeling via partial least squares (PLS-SEM) tested the research hypotheses. The findings uncovered a thematic hierarchy comprising three overarching themes: conflict in cognitive values, heterogeneity in structural mechanisms, and inhibitory individual mechanisms; seven organizing themes; and 31 basic themes, which dynamically interact to form a comprehensive pattern of cognitive dissonance in the auditing profession. The quantitative results further revealed that auditors' cognitive dissonance exerts a negative and significant influence on professional skepticism. These findings offer pathways to improving audit processes, reducing judgment errors, and enhancing financial reporting quality. Thus, this study stands as an inspiring and practical reference for researchers, auditors, and standard setters.

Keywords: Auditors’ cognitive dissonance; psychological factors; individual mechanisms; professional skepticism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 D91 M14 M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/article_8375.html?lang=en

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:jaccad:023587

DOI: 10.22099/jaa.2025.53469.2515

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA) is currently edited by Mohammad Namazi

More articles in Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA) from Shiraz University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Amin Nazemi ().