Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements
Productivity Commission ()
Additional contact information
Productivity Commission: Productivity Commission
No 43 in Research Reports from Productivity Commission, Government of Australia
Abstract:
The Productivity Commission was asked to examine the effects of bilateral and regional trade agreements, including on trade and investment barriers, regional integration and Australia's economy generally. The Commission concluded the benefits of these agreements have been oversold and the processes for developing them should be improved. The Commission found that while there is the potential for some gains from preferential agreements, unilateral reform and non-discriminatory trade liberalisation offer larger benefits.
While tariff preferences in trade agreements can benefit some industries, the Commission found little evidence that Australia's recent bilateral agreements had provided substantial commercial benefits. The main factors that influence decisions to do business in other countries are likely to lie outside the scope of such agreements. The study concluded that while preferential trade agreements could increase national income, the net effect is likely to be modest.
The study also found that some provisions included in Australia's recent preferential trade agreements — including investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms, government procurement requirements, intellectual property protections and provisions affecting areas traditionally the province of domestic policy, such as culture — potentially entail significant costs or risks.
To ensure that options other than trade agreements are properly considered, and that any further agreements entered into are warranted, the study recommended that the Government make changes to its trade policy development processes. Under the Commission's proposals, the Government would undertake an annual Trade Policy Review to better identify priorities, enhance the value of consultation and consider trade policy in a broader context. And where there is an interest in pursuing a trade agreement with particular countries, economic assessments should be based on realistic scenarios with any modelling overseen by an independent body. Final assessments to government should be based on the negotiated text of the agreement.
Keywords: bilateral trade; regional trade; trade liberalisation; investment barriers; trade barriers; bilateral agreements; tariff reductions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F10 O24 P45 Q17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
ISBN: 978-1-74037-329-6
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1 ... greements-report.pdf Full PDF of report (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/104203/trade-agreements-report.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/104203/trade-agreements-report.pdf)
http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/trade-agreements/report Publication webpage (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/trade-agreements/report [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/trade-agreements/report)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:prodcs:0043
Access Statistics for this book
More books in Research Reports from Productivity Commission, Government of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MAPS ().