Predicting Committee Behavior in Majority Rule Voting Experiments

Stephen Salant and Eban Goodstein

RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, vol. 21, issue 2, 293-313

Abstract: In past experiments, committees voting under majority rule have often failed to choose the Condorcet alternative (the core). Since this failure of theory might be due to flaws in experimental design, we developed a voting procedure in which the unique element in the core is also the unique outcome when a Nash equilibrium in undominated strategies for the whole game induces a Nash equilibrium in undominated strategies for every subgame. Nevertheless, our committees frequently choose other alternatives. To explain these results, we formulated a new theory that takes account of threshold effects and identifies a "selection set" predicted to contain the committee's choice. The revised theory performs well both in our experiments and in past experiments.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%2819902 ... O%3B2-H&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: PREDICTING COMMITTEE BEHAVIOR IN MAJORITY-RULE VOTING EXPERIMENTS (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rje:randje:v:21:y:1990:i:summer:p:293-313

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://editorialexp ... i-bin/rje_online.cgi

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in RAND Journal of Economics from The RAND Corporation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().