Russia, Poland, and China: Models of post-socialist rural development. Round table

Россия, Польша, Китай — пути постсоциалистического сельского развития Круглый стол

Babashkin, Vladimir (Бабашкин, Владимир) (), Boni, Ludmila (Бони, Людмила), Gordon, Alexander (Гордон, Александр) (), Kisiel, Roman (Кисель, Роман) (), Nikulin, Alexander (Никулин, Александр) (), Pugacheva, Marina (Пугачева, Марина), Trotsuk, Irina (Троцук, Ирина) () and Hairong, Yan (Хайжун, Янь) ()
Additional contact information
Babashkin, Vladimir (Бабашкин, Владимир): Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Boni, Ludmila (Бони, Людмила): Russian Academy of Sciences
Gordon, Alexander (Гордон, Александр): INION of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Kisiel, Roman (Кисель, Роман): University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Nikulin, Alexander (Никулин, Александр): Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Pugacheva, Marina (Пугачева, Марина): Centre for Fundamental Sociology Higher School of Economics
Trotsuk, Irina (Троцук, Ирина): Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Hairong, Yan (Хайжун, Янь): Polytechnic University

Russian Peasant Studies, 2017, vol. 2, issue 3, 120-151

Abstract: This article is a transcript of the round table at the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation on March 27, which focused on the comparative analysis of the strategic directions of post-socialist rural development in the People’s Republic of China, the Polish People’s Republic and the Russian Federation. Professor Roman Kisiel made a presentation on the problems of Polish rural economy; professor Yan Hairong highlighted the dialectics of contradictions between collective and private farming in China. To a certain extent the Russian scientists L.D. Boni, V.V. Babashkin, and A.V. Gordon became the co-presenters of the Polish and Chinese colleagues when discussing such problems of rural development as the interaction of large and small-scale agrarian production, capitalist, family and collective forms of agriculture, economy and ecology, the city and village, and especially the national agrarian policies regulating all the above. In many ways, China and Poland turned out to be the poles of political and social-cultural agrarian transformations, which determine possible variations of regional models of rural-urban development in Russia. The round table discussion can be useful not only for academic scientists, but also for practitioners involved in developing state and municipal agrarian policies that are to take into account international agrarian experience.

Keywords: peasantry; land ownership; agrarian reforms; rural development; comparative studies; China; Poland; Russia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/rupeas/rps1722.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:rupeas:rps1722

Access Statistics for this article

Russian Peasant Studies is currently edited by Alexander Nikulin

More articles in Russian Peasant Studies from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().