NON-INSTITUTIONAL HUMANITIES, PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE, INFORMAL EDUCATION: THE CONTOURS OF THE EDUCATIONAL CREATIVE INDUSTRY
ВНЕИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ ГУМАНИСТИКА, ФИЛОСОФСКАЯ ПРАКТИКА, ИНФОРМАЛЬНОЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ: КОНТУРЫ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЙ КРЕАТИВНОЙ ИНДУСТРИИ
Shalagina, Gulnara (Шалагина, Гульнара) ()
Additional contact information
Shalagina, Gulnara (Шалагина, Гульнара): Kazan National Research Technological University
Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, 2021, 116-126
Abstract:
Introduction. Non-institutional humanities, philosophical practice, and informal education are “a family like” phenomena that are outside the social institution of science and education and are adjacent to socio-cultural activities and social work. The purpose of the article is to outline the contours of the informal educational creative industry in the postmodern society, which combines non-institutional humanities, philosophical practice, and informal education. Methods. The author uses the methods of autobiographical reflection, comparative analysis, empirical observation and analysis of the primary sources of non-institutional humanities. Scientific novelty of the research. The transition to nonmaterial work of the postmodern era is the reason for the relevance of the area under study. The growing demand of a contemporary for such issues as the meaning of life, happiness, the growth of the precariat, the ousting of philosophy from formal education constitute a new social reality that determines the novelty of the research in the informal educational creative industry. Results. The author classifies non-institutional humanities according to the spheres of its existence and the strategies of subject genesis presented in the teachings. The concept of dedifferentiation is considered as an explanation of the area under study in postmodernism. The specificity of the philosophical approach in the work of a practicing philosopher is considered. Conclusions. The author connects the prospects of the informal educational creative industry with institutionalization in the way of leisure, entertainment, and other personal services. The author makes conclusions about the differences between formal and informal education, and indicates the risks and opportunities for the development of the informal philosophical sector.
Keywords: non-institutional humanities; philosophical practice; informal education; informal educational creative industry; dedifferentiation; postmodernity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp2109.pdf
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:spower:sp2109
Access Statistics for this article
Sotsium i vlast / Society and power is currently edited by Sergey Zyryanov
More articles in Sotsium i vlast / Society and power from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().