SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM: SUBJECT MATTER, ORIGINS, VERSIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TO KNOWLEDGE

СОЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КОНСТРУКТИВИЗМ: СУЩНОСТЬ, ИСТОКИ, ВЕРСИИ КОНСТРУКТИВИСТСКОГО ПОДХОДА К ЗНАНИЮ

Kabanov, Alexander (Кабанов, Александр) ()
Additional contact information
Kabanov, Alexander (Кабанов, Александр): Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev

Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, 2021, 7-17

Abstract: Introduction. Starting from R. Merton’s pioneer works, social studies of science have been a major part of Western intellectual and scientific life. The total number of periodicals on the subject, that is over 20, illustrates the point best. Meanwhile Russian social studies of science are far less intensive. Moreover Western studies of social constructivist type still haven’t received sufficient coverage in Russian scientific literature. Our article is an attempt to somewhat reverse the situation. The aim of the article is to analyze social constructivism evolution in the English speaking countries starting from Berger and Luckmann’s seminal work “The Social Construction of Reality” in 1966; to classify social constructivist versions of science together with their most prominent traits. Methods. When considering the problem, the author uses Y. Hacking’s schematic definition of social construction, P. Kitcher’s scheme of “socio-historical cluster” and M. Baghramian’s “objectivist conception of science”. Scientific novelty of the research. The analysis provides reasons for social constructivism popularity during the “science wars”; specifies social ontology and epistemic status of scientific knowledge in moderate versions of social constructivism; specifies some discourse peculiarities of radical versions of social constructivism (the consequence of somewhat unusual reception of continental tradition) and its view of the science. Results. The basic results are: a) certain convergence of ontological positions in analytic and moderate versions of social constructivist type, b) controversial issues of social (historical) approach to scientific explanation and c) controversial issues of postmodern rhetoric in radical versions. Conclusions. Social studies of science play an important role in science and society, the critical comments towards social constructivist versions notwithstanding.

Keywords: social constructivism; social epistemology; social studies of science; postmodernism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp2111.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rnp:spower:sp2111

Access Statistics for this article

Sotsium i vlast / Society and power is currently edited by Sergey Zyryanov

More articles in Sotsium i vlast / Society and power from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by RANEPA maintainer ().