Redesigning ratings: assessing the discriminatory power of credit scores under censoring

Holger Kraft and Gerald Kroisandt and Marlene Müller

Journal of Credit Risk

Abstract: ABSTRACT Redesigning rating systems is becoming an important issue for banks and other financial institutions in processing the implementation of the Basel II and III (www.bis.org/bcbs/basel3.htm) accords. The available database for this task typically contains only the accepted credit applicants and is thus censored. To evaluate existing and alternative rating systems, we would actually need the full database of all past credit applicants. In this paper, we discuss how to assess the performance of credit ratings under the assumption that, for credit data, only some of the defaults and nondefaults are observed. The paper investigates criteria based on the difference of the score distributions under default and nondefault, such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, the accuracy ratio and the area under the curve. We show how to estimate bounds for these criteria under typical circumstances, ie, with the bank only storing the data of accepted credit applications. We show that these bounds can be helpful to assess discriminatory power even when some of the data is not available.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-credit-risk/238563 ... ores-under-censoring (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsk:journ1:2385638

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Credit Risk from Journal of Credit Risk
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Paine ().