Does the impact of exchange-traded funds flows on commodities prices involve stockpiling as a signature? An empirical investigation

Steve Ohana and Xiaoying Huang

Journal of Energy Markets

Abstract: A number of prominent authors have recently argued that any abnormal impact of speculators on commodities prices should involve stockpiling as a signature. Others contend, by contrast, that due to the price inelasticity of supply and demand in commodity markets, speculation could distort commodity prices without any change in inventories. Motivated by this debate, this paper examines the relation between the investment flows into the three main commodity index exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and the prices, inventory and term structure of four US-traded energy commodities. Using weekly inventory data from the Energy Information Agency and futures prices from NYMEX energy contracts, we do not find any significant relation between commodity index flows and inventory or term structure. By contrast, we retrieve the short-term impacts of index flows on energy commodities’ futures prices that have already been evidenced in the literature. An extension of our framework of analysis to twelve US-traded agricultural contracts confirms these conclusions. Hence, our results suggest that stockpiling is not necessarily a “signature†of an abnormal impact of speculators on commodities prices.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets/560 ... irical-investigation (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsk:journ2:5606596

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Energy Markets from Journal of Energy Markets
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Paine ().