Mixed Approach Pros And Cons of Positivism and Alternativism:Towards The Perfection of Science Development

Dian Indri Purnamasari

International Journal of Management Sciences, 2016, vol. 7, issue 4, 188-194

Abstract: We discuss the following questions: “Which one of these approaches is the best, and is it possible that the two schools of thought be "united" for the perfection of science development?†In accounting methodology or in any particular study, it is better that the use of both approaches were left to their respective researchers in discussing a topic, without criticizing each other and claim that one approach is better than the other. The two may complement and refine each other’s topics studied in depth from different perspectives. Thus, it is expected that the development of science will lead to perfection with the development of various approaches used.

Keywords: Philosophy; Theory; Methodology; Positivism; Alternativism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%202_1497446483.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rss:jnljms:v7i4p2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Management Sciences from Research Academy of Social Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Danish Khalil ().