Local level institutional complementarities in contemporary China. A comparison between Nanjing and Suzhou

Complémentarités institutionnelles locales en Chine contemporaine: comparaison entre Nanjing et Suzhou

Alexandre De Podestá Gomes

Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, 2020, vol. 27

Abstract: This paper has the objective of bringing to light and comparing two different types of institutional arrangements existing in two different prefecture-level cities in China: Nanjing and Suzhou. Although both are considered affluent cities, and located in the same broad economic area, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and the same sub-provincial region, Southern Jiangsu, the cities present markedly distinct local institutional arrangements and accumulation regimes. The paper argues that the historical legacies of Nanjing and Suzhou have moulded the distinct institutional arrangements found in both cities, and that institutional path-dependences shaped the policies and strategies the cities decided to implement, eventually leading to distinct accumulation regimes. This study privileges a political economy definition of institutions (Amable, 2003; Boyer, 1988), and employs the concept of institutional complementarities (Amable, 2016; Aoki, 1994) in order to tackle the institutional arrangements of Nanjing and Suzhou. Initially, the paper introduces the debate on the nature of China’s state, arguing that the country is better characterized by its internal institutional heterogeneities, and that these heterogeneities often reveal themselves at subnational levels. Then the paper proceeds by presenting the analytical framework employed in this research and, after introducing the definitions of institutions and institutional complementarities, a comparison between Nanjing and Suzhou is presented. The final sections summarize the institutional characteristics and accumulation regimes found in both cities and conclude with the analysis.

Keywords: institutional complementarities; China; regional models; decentralization; Nanjing; Suzhou; complémentarités institutionnelles; Chine; modèles régionaux; décentralisation; Nanjing; Suzhou (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B52 H70 O43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/16716 (text/html)
https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/pdf/16716 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rvr:journl:2020:16716

DOI: 10.4000/regulation.16716

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs from Association Recherche et Régulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pascal Seppecher ().