Fundamentally Unacceptable yet Occasionally Unavoidable: China’s Options on External Interference in the Middle East

Yitzhak Shichor

China Report, 2013, vol. 49, issue 1, 25-41

Abstract: China’s ‘non-interference’ policy is not a new phenomenon. It originates in pre-modern Chinese history when the Empire had been isolated from the rest of the world, as well as in the Mao era when the Chinese–even if they had the will to interfere–did not have the capabilities. Post-Mao and post-Cold War, China has the capabilities but not yet the will to become more involved. Still, economic prosperity and growing political prominence have forced Beijing to compromise. Fundamentally, China’s first option remains ‘non-interference’ and settling of conflicts by the parties concerned. Yet if this fails, then the Chinese prefer an intervention by a regional or professional organisation. If this attempt too, fails, then, reluctantly, Beijing turns to the United Nations Security Council as an option. The worst option is external and independent intervention. All these options are evident in China’s Middle East policy.

Keywords: Arab League; African Union; UN Security Council; Libya; Syria; Sudan; Darfur; peacekeeping; intervention; Iran-Iraq War; Gulf War (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445513479219 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:25-41

DOI: 10.1177/0009445513479219

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in China Report
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().