Different Countries, Different Perspectives: A Comparative Analysis of the South China Sea Disputes Coverage by Malaysian and Chinese Newspapers

Yang Lai Fong, Ramachandran Ponnan and Antoon De Rycker
Additional contact information
Yang Lai Fong: Department of Journalism, Xiamen University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Ramachandran Ponnan: School of Communication, Taylor’s University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Antoon De Rycker: School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Berjaya University College, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

China Report, 2020, vol. 56, issue 1, 39-59

Abstract: The South China Sea disputes involve both island and maritime claims among several sovereign states within the region, namely China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei, Vietnam and Taiwan. Framing an analysis of international news and diplomatic relations allows researchers to examine how news organisations provide their audiences with context regarding news stories through content promotion and exclusion. This study examined how the Malaysian and Chinese newspapers reported about the South China Sea disputes and Malaysia–China bilateral relations. The findings indicated that the newspapers reported the topics with different intensity and prominence, while different news sources were employed. It was also found that conflict was a salient frame used by the various newspapers. In addition, this study found that the Malaysian and Chinese newspapers exhibited different valence in reporting the South China Sea disputes. Among the Malaysian newspapers under examination in this study, Sin Chew Daily (a Chinese-language daily) employed the most similar frame to that of the Chinese newspapers, where the coverage was pervasive with supportive valence towards China.

Keywords: South China Sea disputes; Malaysia-China relations; diplomacy; bilateral relations; framing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445519895627 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:56:y:2020:i:1:p:39-59

DOI: 10.1177/0009445519895627

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in China Report
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().