Brexit: ‘Revolt’ against the ‘elites’ or Trojan horse for more deregulation?

Arantza Gomez Arana, Jay Rowe, Alex de Ruyter, Rebecca Semmens-Wheeler and Kimberley Hill
Additional contact information
Rebecca Semmens-Wheeler: Birmingham City University, UK
Kimberley Hill: University of Northampton, UK

The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2019, vol. 30, issue 4, 498-512

Abstract: This article explores the UK vote in 2016 to exit the European Union, colloquially known as ‘Brexit’. Brexit has been portrayed as a British backlash against globalisation and a desire for a reassertion of sovereignty by the UK as a nation-state. In this context, a vote to leave the European Union has been regarded by its protagonists as a vote to ‘take back control’ to ‘make our own laws’ and ‘let in [only] who we want’. We take a particular interest in the stance of key ‘Brexiteers’ in the UK towards regulation, with the example of the labour market. The article commences by assessing the notion of Brexit as a means to secure further market liberalisation. This analysis is then followed by an account of migration as a key issue, the withdrawal process and likely future trajectory of Brexit. We argue that in contrast to the expectations of those who voted Leave in 2016, the UK as a mid-sized open economy will be a rule-taker and will either remain in the European regulatory orbit, or otherwise drift into the American one. JEL Codes : F2, F53, F55, F66, K33

Keywords: Brexit; deregulation; European Union; immigration; inequality; market regulation; nationalism; neoliberalism; sovereignty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304619881271 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:498-512

DOI: 10.1177/1035304619881271

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().