EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inequality regimes in male-dominated trades: What role do apprenticeship intermediaries (GTOs) play?

Larissa Bamberry, Donna Bridges, Elizabeth Wulff and Branka Krivokapic-Skoko

The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2022, vol. 33, issue 3, 547-565

Abstract: In Australia and internationally, women continue to be underrepresented in male-dominated trade occupations. A notable barrier is the apprenticeship system, which requires women to overcome obstacles in employment and training. Government and industry stakeholders have encouraged women’s apprenticeships in male-dominated trades through the development of Group Training Organisations’ (GTOs) that operate as intermediaries between apprentices and employers. Extending Acker’s model of workplace inequality regimes, we argue that inequality regimes operate between organisations at an industry-wide level. We ask ‘ Do GTOs operate to produce and reproduce workplace and industry-wide inequality regimes? Or can they facilitate improved gender diversity in male-dominated trades? ’ Drawing on a recent study of regional tradeswomen’s employment, we find that although GTOs have an important role in facilitating gender diversity, they have inconsistent results in challenging existing inequality regimes. There is a risk that they may become a vector of transmission for workplace inequality regimes to the broader industry. JEL Codes: R23, J71, I24

Keywords: Apprenticeships; gender; male-dominated industries; sexual harassment; workplace inequality regimes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10353046221096270 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:547-565

DOI: 10.1177/10353046221096270

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:547-565