Incomplete information and bargaining in the EU: An explanation of first-reading non-agreements

Vibeke Wøien Hansen

European Union Politics, 2014, vol. 15, issue 4, 472-495

Abstract: According to the logic of standard veto bargaining models with complete information, bargaining in the European Union should never reach the second reading of the ordinary legislative procedure (co-decision). Even so, non-agreement at the first reading occurs frequently in European Union decision making. How can this be explained? Drawing upon game theory on bargaining with incomplete information, two specific predictions with regard to the occurrence of first-reading non-agreements can be generated. First-reading agreements are less likely to occur (1) the greater the distance between the ideal point of the Council and the ideal point of the European Parliament and (2) the greater the salience attached to the proposal. This article combines positional and proposal-specific data and finds robust support for both hypotheses in two different empirical tests.

Keywords: European Union; legislative politics; incomplete information; preferences; salience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116514541555 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:472-495

DOI: 10.1177/1465116514541555

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().