Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations

Adriana Bunea

European Union Politics, 2015, vol. 16, issue 2, 281-299

Abstract: What explains interest groups’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations? The article argues that formal membership ties facilitate organisational coordination and the creation of lobbying coalitions among interest groups, which in turn affects their position alignments. This argument is supported by empirical evidence from five environmental consultations. Sharing a formal membership tie within an over-arching organisational structure has a stronger effect on position alignment than the fact of representing the same type of interest or having the same organisational form. Coordinated, coalition-based lobbying accounts to a significant extent for stakeholders’ position alignments in the EU open consultations. The ‘social’ embeddedness of lobbying has a direct effect on the advocacy strategies interest groups decide to employ during the early stages of EU policymaking.

Keywords: Coordinated lobbying; European Commission; membership ties; open consultations; position alignments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116514558338 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:281-299

DOI: 10.1177/1465116514558338

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().