EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analysing Roll Calls of the European Parliament

Jeong-Hun Han
Additional contact information
Jeong-Hun Han: University of Rochester, USA, jhan@troi.cc.rochester.edu

European Union Politics, 2007, vol. 8, issue 4, 479-507

Abstract: This article explores the performance of a Bayesian application of spatial voting models to the roll calls of the Fifth European Parliament (EP). Focusing on two distinct voting behaviours of members of the EP (MEPs) — high absenteeism and the defection from majority alternatives caused by the influence of national parties — it shows that the Bayesian method is complementary to the standard NOMINATE method. In general, the two methods produce very similar estimates and work as robustness checks for the results from each other. However, the Bayesian method enables us to measure the uncertainty of estimates resulting from the estimation with a large number of missing data and some random-appearing roll calls. In this way, it helps us draw more confident inferences about MEPs' voting behaviour.

Keywords: EP; ideal points; MCMC; NOMINATE; roll call votes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116507082811 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:8:y:2007:i:4:p:479-507

DOI: 10.1177/1465116507082811

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Union Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:8:y:2007:i:4:p:479-507