Flood Perception and Mitigation: The Role of Severity, Agency, and Experience in the Purchase of Flood Protection, and the Communication of Flood Information

Emma Soane, Iljana Schubert, Peter Challenor, Rebecca Lunn, Sunitha Narendran and Simon Pollard
Additional contact information
Emma Soane: Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, England
Iljana Schubert: Department of Leadership, HRM and Organisation, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames KT 7LB, England
Peter Challenor: National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, England
Rebecca Lunn: University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Campus, 16 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XQ, Scotland
Sunitha Narendran: Department of Leadership, HRM and Organisation, Kingston University, Kingston Hill, Kingston upon Thames KT2 7LB, England
Simon Pollard: Cranfield University, Collaborative Centre of Excellence in Understanding and Managing Natural and Environmental Risks, Cranfield MK43 0AL, England

Environment and Planning A, 2010, vol. 42, issue 12, 3023-3038

Abstract: Protection of human life and property from flooding is a strategic priority in the UK. We examine how to encourage home owners to protect themselves and their residences. A model of factors that influence the decision to buy flood-protection devices is tested using survey data from 2109 home owners. The results show that the majority of respondents have not purchased domestic flood protection ( N = 1732; 82.1%). Purchase of flood-protection devices was influenced by age; perceived seriousness; and beliefs about, and trust in, the role of regulators in managing flooding. In younger respondents the perceived seriousness of the dangers of flooding acted as precursors and barriers to action depending on individual sense of responsibility and agency. The second part of the study examines responsiveness to information. Information about flooding alone was insufficient to promote behavioural change, particularly among people who had not experienced a flood or who believed that they were not in a flood zone. Implications for understanding flood protection, managing agency issues, and flood-communication campaigns are discussed.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a43238 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:12:p:3023-3038

DOI: 10.1068/a43238

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().