The state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization

Shenjing He, Mengzhu Zhang and Zongcai Wei
Additional contact information
Shenjing He: Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, China; The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, China
Mengzhu Zhang: Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, China; The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, China
Zongcai Wei: Department of Urban Planning, School of Architecture, State key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, China

Environment and Planning A, 2020, vol. 52, issue 3, 632-653

Abstract: Since 2008, China has introduced state-led financialization to inject low-interest, stable and long-term loans to facilitate urban redevelopment through national shantytown redevelopment schemes (SRSs). Extending critical state theories to China’s transitional economy, we consider SRSs to be a policy model of the state project (mode of policy-making) of crisis management that aims to revitalize the national economy in the wake of the global financial crisis. Essentially, this state project serves to tackle the legitimation crisis threatened by both the economic crisis and the escalating social discontent. Drawing on an empirical study of Chengdu, a regional hub in western China spearheading SRSs, this paper examines how the Chinese state at different levels interacts with the nascent financial market in the creation of a new “model†of urban redevelopment under state-led financialization. Having been exploited to manage economic and legitimation crises, this model has simultaneously become a source of “crisis of crisis-management†owing to the state’s “over-intervention†. This research contributes to a fresh understanding of the multiplicity of financialization by linking the financialization of urban built environment with the financialization of the state project, in which financial motives and practices shape the mode of policy making. The Chinese experience also presents a decentered interpretation of state-led financialization that renews our understanding of the multifaceted state and state projects, particularly the hybridized, often contradictory motivations and socio-economic outcomes of state interventions.

Keywords: State project; crisis management; state-led financialization; shantytown redevelopment schemes; securitization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19882427 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:3:p:632-653

DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19882427

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().