The multiple-theories problem: The case of spatial industrial clustering

Caterina Marchionni and Päivi Oinas
Additional contact information
Caterina Marchionni: Practical Philosophy, Faculty of Social Science, 3835University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Päivi Oinas: Department of Geography and Geology, 8058University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Environment and Planning A, 2023, vol. 55, issue 1, 46-62

Abstract: Multiple theories of the same phenomenon abound in many interdisciplinary research areas, but it is often unclear how the theories relate, and there are no clear guidelines for dealing with this plurality. The history of research on spatial industrial clustering is a case in point. We identify a number of solutions to the problem of multiple theoretical accounts proposed in this literature. We label them definitional, taxonomic, integrative, and multi-perspectival. We then offer the erotetic solution as an indispensable complement to any attempt at resolving the multiple-theories problem. It accounts for theoretical plurality in terms of different explanation-seeking questions different theories aim to address. We analyse three prominent explanations in the recent history of research on spatial industrial clustering and show how the erotetic approach can contribute to foster interdisciplinary dialogue.

Keywords: Contrastive explanation; interdisciplinarity; clusters; erotetics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221122791 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:1:p:46-62

DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221122791

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning A
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().