Multicriteria Evaluation: Measures, Manipulation, and Meaning—A Reply

H Voogd
Additional contact information
H Voogd: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, Groningen, 9700 AV, The Netherlands

Environment and Planning B, 1988, vol. 15, issue 1, 65-72

Abstract: In this paper a reply is given to the comments and criticisms raised by Buckley in his article on the meaning of multicriteria evaluation. Several issues are discussed, among them the weighting of criterion scores, the use of ordinal measures, and the relation between multicriteria evaluation and cost-benefit evaluation. Some attention is paid to the use of natural measures.

Date: 1988
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b150065 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envirb:v:15:y:1988:i:1:p:65-72

DOI: 10.1068/b150065

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment and Planning B
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().