Justifying an Intentional Species Extinction: The Case of Anopheles gambiae

Daniel Edward Callies and Yasha Rohwer

Environmental Values, 2022, vol. 31, issue 2, 193-210

Abstract: Each year, over 200 million people are infected with the malaria parasite, nearly half a million of whom succumb to the disease. Emerging genetic technologies could, in theory, eliminate the burden of malaria throughout the world by intentionally eradicating the mosquitoes that transmit the disease. In this paper, we offer an ethical examination of the intentional eradication of Anopheles gambiae , the main malaria vector of sub-Saharan Africa. In our evaluation, we focus on two main considerations: the benefit of alleviating the malaria burden, and the loss of value that would accompany the eradication of the species. We outline a typology of the different ways in which species are valued or could be valuable, then use that typology to appraise the value of the species in question. We argue that Anopheles gambiae has minor (and redundant) instrumental value, little final subjective value and no objective final value.

Keywords: Extinction; mosquitoes; biodiversity; intrinsic value; instrumental value malaria; gene drive (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3197/096327121X16081160834786 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:envval:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:193-210

DOI: 10.3197/096327121X16081160834786

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environmental Values
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().